1992 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (221 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 2009 Renault Megane | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 626 | Megane |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 93 mm |
Top Speed | 219 km/hour | 236 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2630 mm |