1992 Mercury Cougar vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Ram weights approximately 71 kg more than 1992 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mercury Cougar | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Mercury | Dodge |
Model | Cougar | Ram |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3798 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 345 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |