1992 Renault Racoon vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Racoon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Racoon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 296 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon.

Compare all specifications: