1992 Rover 100 1.4 D vs. 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 2,444 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace (89 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace weights approximately 845 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace (226 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 100 1.4 D | Hi-Ace |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1358 cc | 2444 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 89 Nm | 226 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1960 mm |