1994 Caterham Seven vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1994 Caterham Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Caterham Seven (165 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Caterham Seven should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Because 1994 Caterham Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Caterham Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Caterham Seven (203 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (118 Nm). This means 1994 Caterham Seven will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Caterham Seven | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
| Make | Caterham | Renault |
| Model | Seven | Kangoo |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1783 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 21.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2630 mm |
