1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 785 kg more than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Because 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (273 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Aerostar | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 4164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 273 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 2300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2790 mm |