1994 Lancia Zeta vs. 1999 Mazda Activehicle
To start off, 1999 Mazda Activehicle is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Activehicle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Because 1999 Mazda Activehicle is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Lancia Zeta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (278 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda Activehicle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Lancia Zeta | 1999 Mazda Activehicle | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Zeta | Activehicle |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1929 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 278 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
