1994 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (170 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda 626 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 626 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
