1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,377 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander. (158 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander.
2006 Mitsubishi Outlander has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi |
Model | FTO | Outlander |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2377 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |