1994 Rover 200 vs. 1998 Zagato Zuma
To start off, 1998 Zagato Zuma is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,894 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Zagato Zuma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Zagato Zuma (108 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Zagato Zuma should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover 200 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1998 Zagato Zuma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Zagato Zuma (235 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1998 Zagato Zuma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover 200 | 1998 Zagato Zuma | |
Make | Rover | Zagato |
Model | 200 | Zuma |
Year Released | 1994 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1894 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 95.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2520 mm |