1994 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 425 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover 200 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Rover | Cadillac |
| Model | 200 | BLS |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 365 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1480 mm |
