1995 AC Ace vs. 1964 Austin Princess
To start off, 1995 AC Ace is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 AC Ace (350 HP) has 231 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess.
Because 1964 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 AC Ace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 AC Ace (407 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 1995 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 AC Ace | 1964 Austin Princess | |
| Make | AC | Austin |
| Model | Ace | Princess |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 3993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 119 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3360 mm |
