1995 Audi TT vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 80 kg more than 1995 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi TT (210 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (148 Nm). This means 1995 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi TT | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | TT | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 80.5 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2630 mm |