1995 BMW CLS vs. 1999 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1999 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1999 Jeep Wrangler. (122 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1999 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1999 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Jeep Wrangler. (193 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1999 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | CLS | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2463 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 193 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2380 mm |
