1995 BMW CLS vs. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (269 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Because 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | CLS | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 374 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2880 mm |