1995 BMW CLS vs. 2004 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 494 more horse power than 1995 BMW CLS. (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW CLS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 730 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2004 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | BMW | Lotec |
| Model | CLS | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 844 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1150 mm |
