1995 BMW CLS vs. 2006 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac DTS. (275 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac DTS.
Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac DTS (396 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2006 Cadillac DTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | CLS | DTS |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4572 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 396 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2940 mm |
