1995 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 (968 Nm) has 887 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 1995 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Jaguar XJ220 | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | XJ220 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 3492 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Torque | 968 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Top Speed | 368 km/hour | 115 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
