1995 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover (223 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 936 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover (381 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Land Rover Range Rover | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Land Rover | Triumph |
| Model | Range Rover | Renown |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4554 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 381 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2750 mm |
