1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1189 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 626 | Armada |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 2399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 106 L |