1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 626 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 58 L |