1995 Mercury Tracer vs. 2012 Audi S6
To start off, 2012 Audi S6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi S6 (414 HP) has 327 more horse power than 1995 Mercury Tracer. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mercury Tracer.
Because 2012 Audi S6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mercury Tracer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi S6 (500 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mercury Tracer. (146 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2012 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mercury Tracer | 2012 Audi S6 | |
| Make | Mercury | Audi |
| Model | Tracer | S6 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1859 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 414 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
