1996 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2006 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki SX4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (305 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki SX4. (184 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki SX4.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2006 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | BMW | Suzuki |
Model | M3 | SX4 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |