1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Tracker | 66 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1287 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
