1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2002 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2002 Mercury Cougar is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Mercury Cougar. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercury Cougar.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 176 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles. 2002 Mercury Cougar has automatic transmission and 1996 Chrysler Sebring has manual transmission. 1996 Chrysler Sebring will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mercury Cougar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chrysler Sebring 2002 Mercury Cougar
Make Chrysler Mercury
Model Sebring Cougar
Year Released 1996 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 1982 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 176 Nm 176 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1310 kg 1310 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1770 mm