1996 Daewoo Nexia vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Nexia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Nexia would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. 1996 Daewoo Nexia has automatic transmission and 2012 Honda CR-Z has manual transmission. 2012 Honda CR-Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Daewoo Nexia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Nexia | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Daewoo | Honda |
Model | Nexia | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 173 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |