1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2004 Saab 93
To start off, 2004 Saab 93 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saab 93 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Saab 93, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Saab 93. (280 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Saab 93.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2004 Saab 93 | |
Make | Dodge | Saab |
Model | Ram | 93 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1536 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2710 mm |