1996 Ford Ka vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 140 (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1974 Volvo 140 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ka | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ka | 140 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 60 L |