1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1947 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1947 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1947 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Mustang | 1947 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mustang | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1947 |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2850 mm |
