1996 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Tribute (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1996 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 113 kg more than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (262 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Thunderbird | 2005 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | Tribute |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 262 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1507 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 62 L |