1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1966 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK II would be higher.
Because 1966 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1966 Jaguar MK II | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | XU 6 | MK II |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
