1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1981 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Holden Commodore would be higher.
Because 1981 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Holden Commodore. (231 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1981 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | XU 6 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 231 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
