1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (384 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | XU 6 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 384 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
