1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2006 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Land Rover LR3. (427 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Land Rover LR3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 2006 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Holden | Land Rover |
Model | XU 6 | LR3 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |