1996 Lada 110 vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada 110 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1996 Lada 110. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada 110.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada 110 | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Lada | MG |
Model | 110 | ZT |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |