1996 Lotus Elan vs. 1950 Maserati 8CLT
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 8CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 8CLT would be higher. At 2,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Maserati 8CLT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 8CLT (424 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1996 Lotus Elan. (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 8CLT should accelerate faster than 1996 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotus Elan weights approximately 220 kg more than 1950 Maserati 8CLT.
Because 1950 Maserati 8CLT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati 8CLT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lotus Elan | 1950 Maserati 8CLT | |
Make | Lotus | Maserati |
Model | Elan | 8CLT |
Year Released | 1996 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 424 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2730 mm |