1996 Lotus Elan vs. 1980 Mazda 121
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 121 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elan.
Because 1980 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lotus Elan | 1980 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Elan | 121 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2520 mm |