1996 Mazda 626 vs. 1968 Willys-Overland Dauphine
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Willys-Overland Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Willys-Overland Dauphine would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Willys-Overland Dauphine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Willys-Overland Dauphine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda 626 | 1968 Willys-Overland Dauphine | |
Make | Mazda | Willys-Overland |
Model | 626 | Dauphine |
Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2280 mm |