1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Challenger | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1966 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3967 mm |
