1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. 1978 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse (210 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1978 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse (290 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 1978 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Eclipse | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
