1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 166 more horse power than 1981 Mitsubishi Minica. (29 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1981 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 1981 Mitsubishi Minica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mitsubishi Minica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mitsubishi Minica. (41 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 1981 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | FTO | Minica |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 544 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 29 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1380 mm |
