1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-250 (265 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-250 (339 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2010 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | FTO | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 265 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4717 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1702 mm |
