1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2008 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2008 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2008 Jaguar X-Type. (193 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2008 Jaguar X-Type.
Because 2008 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar X-Type (241 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2008 Jaguar X-Type | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Jaguar |
| Model | FTO | X-Type |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 193 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 241 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 226 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
