1996 Proton 400 vs. 2010 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2010 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hyundai Matrix (102 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 188 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Hyundai Matrix (141 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Hyundai Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 400 | 2010 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Proton | Hyundai |
Model | 400 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1323 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |