1996 Suzuki Baleno vs. 2010 Acura TL
To start off, 2010 Acura TL is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura TL (280 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (119 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura TL weights approximately 653 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Acura TL (344 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (152 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Suzuki Baleno | 2010 Acura TL | |
Make | Suzuki | Acura |
Model | Baleno | TL |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1839 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 344 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1688 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4966 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2776 mm |