1996 Volkswagen Golf vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volkswagen Golf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volkswagen Golf would be higher.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Volkswagen Golf | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Fisker |
| Model | Golf | Karma |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3160 mm |
