1997 Acura TL vs. 2006 BMW Z4
To start off, 2006 BMW Z4 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura TL would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (176 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2006 BMW Z4. (168 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW Z4.
Because 2006 BMW Z4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW Z4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Acura TL | 2006 BMW Z4 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | TL | Z4 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4864 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1786 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1405 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2500 mm |