1997 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW M3 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1997 BMW M3. (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW M3. (236 Nm). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW M3. 2011 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 1997 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1997 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 BMW M3 | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 548 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3967 mm |