1997 Ford Puma vs. 1981 Zastava 2101

To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Puma weights approximately 50 kg more than 1981 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1981 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Puma (126 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 2101.

Compare all specifications: