1997 MCC Smart vs. 1963 Morris Oxford
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Morris Oxford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Morris Oxford (60 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Morris Oxford should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Morris Oxford weights approximately 480 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1963 Morris Oxford | |
Make | MCC | Morris |
Model | Smart | Oxford |
Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 60 HP |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |